To answer @phoenix…
We can all agree that Colin Firth’s portrayal of Mr. Darcy comes closest to Ms. Austen’s ideal. However, I think that Matthew Macfayden’s interpretation of Mr. Darcy says a lot about a 21st century woman’s idea of a romantic guy.
Ms. Austen created the hero to appear aristocratic and haughty (lol, just his name alone reeks of aristocracy. Darcy from the French, D’Arcy. They’re old nobility). Colin Firth nailed the character. It’s easy to see how Elizabeth Bennet could have formed her prejudicial opinion of Mr. Darcy simply based on their first encounter when he stood proudly before the twittering class of Meryton. Firth is believable as Mr. Darcy. He perfected that “resting bitch face” and he gave “zero fucks” to other people’s good opinions.
But I couldn’t say that thing for Matthew Macfayden’s interpretation of Mr. Darcy. Frankly, I initially thought his acting was underwhelming, wishy-washy, lacking in oomph factor when compared to Colin Firth. He appeared more tired than disdainful; old rather than patrician.
That proposal scene in the rain? He looked constipated to me; he had difficulty getting his words out. And the ending scene? I thought he stuttered. But not being a true Austenite, I let reservations go.
But one day I happened to read a write-up on the actor Tom Hanks. It struck me that his characters appealed to many women because they showed a vulnerable side. There’s a flash of that little-boy charm in his male braggadocio. Tom Hank projected the image of a sensitive guy.
And that’s what Macfayden had in common with Tom Hanks. That’s the key to understanding his interpretation of Mr. Darcy: look for the vulnerability. He portrayed Mr. Darcy as a shy, sensitive guy.
In a way, he and Colin Firth were on the opposite end of the spectrum. Firth showed the strong, decisive, manly side of the character. For instance, when his Mr. Darcy said “I’m not good with strangers” as an excuse for his reticence to socialize, we know that it didn’t cut it. If I were Lizzie, I’d go “Pfffttt. Sure. Whatever you say.” Firth projected the sangfroid so well that it was hard to imagine his Mr. Darcy as being shy and rattled.
In contrast, we can see without Macfayden’s Mr. Darcy telling us that he was awkward with strangers.
Look again at the proposal in the rain. Around 1:47.
When he says, ”…end my agony” she answers, “I don’t understand,” listen carefully to the way he delivers the words, “I love you.”
Do you hear it?
He wasn’t declaring himself firmly and decisively. He was tentative. He said those three words quickly and lightly. Usually, when you say “I love you,” you drop your voice on the last word “you.” If you were to denote musical notes for those three words, you’d typically play re-mi-do on the piano.
But with Macfayden’s intonation, he said do-re-mi (sostenuto) with the word “you” floating and hanging in the air.
That’s why I said his sentence sounded hesitant.
And his visuals matched his voice, too. He was drenched. He looked like a drowning man in need of rescuing. His eyebrows were raised, too, as if he was beseeching. And he swallowed as if he was nervous, then blinked his eyes like a little kid expecting a scolding after a confession.
Do you see it?
“I don’t understand,” she said. “I love you…most ardently,” he said.
When Lizzie just stared at him speechless, he added, “Most ardently.” lol. He tried to sound more convincing but it came out more pathetic because he was pleading.
Again, listen to him. “Most arrhh (oh lord, please!) dently.”
Then, he swallowed and blink (signs of nervousness) before saying, “Please do me the honor of accepting my hand.”
“Pleeeaaaase, take my hand.”
Macfayden’s proposal was very much different from Colin Firth’s delivery. Firth didn’t grovel. He didn’t blink when he said, “I beg you most fervently to relieve my suffering and consent to be my wife.” In fact, listen to how Mr. Darcy emphasized the word “beg.” lol.
At 2:12.
He said he was “begging” but the stress he put on the word “beg” indicated that he was ORDERING her to end his suffering. Also, note, Lizzie didn’t interrupt him when he started proposing. How could she? Mr. Darcy was making a case for himself — like a barrister — and he expected a positive outcome.
He was different from Macfayden’s Mr. Darcy who rushed through his proposal because he was expecting to lose his courage any second. Whereas Colin Firth’s Mr. Darcy was restraining himself because he was aware that he was going against very PRUDENT nature, Macfayden’s Mr. Darcy didn’t care at all that he looked totally absurd, declaring himself in the middle of a rainstorm while soaking wet. Macfayden’s Mr. Darcy upended his own pompous image.
Also, take a lot at Macfayden’s fingers here. I thought that was excellent character building. Mr. Darcy was fidgety; he was anxious to be in her presence. But when we consider that it was HE who dropped by to visit her, why was he nervous?
Last, look at their goodbye moment here.
He said stiffly, “Ms. Elizabeth.” Likewise, she said, “Mr. Darcy.”
Neither one of them was smiling but when she turned to Mr. Binkley, she beamed at him. She wasn’t expecting Mr. Darcy to help her up. You could tell when she looked down that she was surprised to see his hand suddenly there holding hers.
Plus, they weren’t wearing gloves.
Skinship, 19th century version!
Visually, I like the way he was gripping his finger. (When the camera highlighted that contact, viewers thought it was more erotic than porn.)
I could easily imagine him thinking, “I’m glad you’re going” when he looked at her before quickly walking away. She unsettled him so. Her departure couldn’t have come a moment sooner.
But his fingers unclenching was most telling. This was a detail that wouldn’t have been included in the Colin Firth’s version of Pride and Prejudice. But it worked very well here in this movie version. It showed us that Mr. Darcy too was affected by that brief hand-touching. He was aware of her presence but he tried to control his feelings while she was visiting. That last touch of theirs almost had him undone.
So yes, Colin Firth remains the quintessential Mr. Darcy for me (hands down better than Sir Laurence Olivier, too). But I must commend Macfayden for bringing a novel approach and making me appreciate his character from a different perspective. We can’t keep on watching P&P and have the same interpretation of the character each time, with just the degree of handsomeness of the actors varying and differentiating one Mr. Darcy from the other. That would be tiresome.
Thus, I’ve come to realize that Macfayden’s portrayal is nuanced and more physical. When I re-watched the last scene with Mr. Darcy and Lizzie in their bed clothes, I wasn’t shocked anymore that there was this much canoodling filmed in the US version of the finale. All throughout the show, Mr. Darcy showed physical response to Lizzie and emotional sensitivity, so the ending dialogue made sense.
Darcy: How are you this evening, my dear?
Lizzie: Very well. Only I wish you wouldn’t call me “my dear.”
Darcy: Why?
Lizzie: Because it’s what my father always calls my mother when he’s crossed about something.
Darcy: What endearments am I allowed?
Lizzie: Well, let me think. Lizzie, for every day. My Pearl, for Sundays. And goddess divine but only on very special occasions.
Darcy: And what shall I call you when I’m crossed? Mrs. Darcy?
Lizzie: No. No. You may only call me Mrs. Darcy when you are completely and perfectly and incandescently happy.
Darcy: And how are you this evening? Mrs. Darcy.
And he held her cheek and kissed her forehead.
Then he said again, “Mrs Darcy” and kissed her cheek;
“Mrs Darcy” and kissed her by the nose;
“Mrs. Darcy” and he kissed her other cheek;
“Mrs. Darcy” and kissed her lips.
@packmule3, Thank you this post (and that begging squirrel totally cracked me up!!! Hahaha..). I know that this is a k-drama blog, but I love how you draw parallels between k-drama, movies and literature. Being a bibliophile bitch, I completely lap it up like hot chocolate 😉 I’m fully on-board for any discussion on Mr.Darcy!!**Long comment alert**
Thanks to your explanations (with visuals), I now see why Macfayden’s portrayal of Mr. Darcy (never made that D’Arcy nobility connection before) is more vulnerable and hence more metro-sexual than Firth’s portrayal. However, personally, I still find Macfayden’s Mr. Darcy to be wishy-washy and eminently forgettable. He just didn’t display the requisite strength of character that a Mr. Darcy should have – I agree that falling in love can make someone vulnerable, but I’m not agreeable with the pleading part. It’s just so non-Darcy to me. Arrogance is an intrinsic part of someone’s personality – one can mellow it down and allow vulnerability show through at specific times and with specific individuals one trusts (like Lizzie), but I don’t think an inherently self-assured and arrogant person should look so pathetic! Again, this is my personal opinion, because for me, Macfayden took away all the “Darcy-ness” from Mr.Darcy. I agree that it is strangely satisfying to see an originally arrogant man become humbled by love, but the reversal doesn’t have to be to this extent. I think Colin Firth’s final proposal was still quite vulnerable (I just watched it again on Youtube…hehe). When he says: “One word from you will silence me on the subject” (exactly Austen’s words), I still think he looks vulnerable without looking pathetic (he looks down and gulps).
Again, this is my personal opinion – I still think Macfayden didn’t do justice to one of my favorite characters in literature. I actually think I like P&P so much because over the period of the novel, Mr.Darcy learns to see beyond his pride (while NOT losing it) to realize how intelligent and unique Lizzie is despite her family background, and Lizzie learns to see beyond her prejudice to realize how caring Mr. Darcy is beneath his outward pride. That is my personal interpretation of how the characters change in each other’s eyes in Austen’s classic – they learn to accept each other’s shortcomings, because they realize that the better qualities ultimately overshadow the shortcomings. Isn’t that what falling in love is all about? Not to change oneself or try to change the other – but to accept the other person as they are, and fall in love despite that?
Hope that made sense 🙂 I’ve watched ep.1 of O2O by the way, and like it so far!
I
BTW that skinship gif is so funny! Haha!
Honestly, I never paid much attention to the ‘without gloves’ hand-holding in the movie till you pointed it out (I think we take such things so much for granted in today’s times that we don’t realize the 19th century implications!)
Sigh…I must one of the few that liked MacFayden’s portrayal of Darcy. He did say in an interview that he knew he had big shoes to fill (because of Firth) so he was trying to bring a different Darcy to the fore. There is this sensitivity about his portrayals of his characters that I adore (so yes to metrosexual sensitive new age man). I adored him in the BBC Little Dorrit. He was better there I felt although he was outshone by Claire Foy. He seemed to graciously accept that he was playing the side character and allowed her to shine…very chivalrous of him. It was Knightley’s portrayal of Elizabeth Bennett that had me wary. I just decided to stop comparing and watched it with no prejudice (😂). I did like her delivery when she spat the words out in that rain scene as she threw his marriage proposal back at this face – that he was the last man on earth she could be prevailed upon to marry. I felt that. Go Lizzie!!
You totally make sense. I’ve no arguments there. 🙂 Although I can understand where Macfayden was going with his character, I too prefer Colin Firth as Mr. Darcy.
For me, any deconstruction/reconstruction of a kdrama, novel, art, music, etc., is acceptable, as long as we can go back to the “roots” and remember what we’re trying to conserve from the original work. I’m not a literature grad, so to me, every venture is a journey of discovery. But returning home to what is essential and familiar is very comforting.
😀
…and that’s why I find your blog so ‘comfortable’ and keep coming back, especially after work has stressed me out! It’s like being ‘comfortably bitchy’ in an environment where we are allowed to dissect dramas and go off in tangents, not knowing where we might land up after the dissections, and just enjoying the whole “journey of discovery” collectively 🙂 🙂
hahaha @nrllee. I told you that I praise him for his effort and his daring-ness. Until he brought out the vulnerable/sensitive side of Mr. Darcy, I didn’t see vulnerability and sensitivity as common traits of the character … or even essential traits to the man, for that matter.
But isn’t that we’re trying to do with our sons? Make them more sensitive? I love and idolize my brothers. My boyfriends in high school and college often came up short when measured against them. But I didn’t raise my own sons to be like my brothers. I raised my boys to read “Little House in the Prairie” and “Little Women,” bought them that Victorian dollhouse (lol, but I was the one who played with it.), and brought them to museums and ballet shows with me, so they’ll — hopefully — be more perceptive and receptive of other sensibilities and perspectives.
But yes, that rain scene! “Spat” is a good word. She did look like a spitting kitten when she turned him down. And didn’t you think that they were going to kiss there? When he leaned in closer?
😀
@nrllee: I agree that it took a lot of guts on Macfayden’s part to go for a role which has become synonymous with Colin Firth!
I kind of liked Knightley’s Liizie and her barbed exterior – I thought Jennifer Ehle’s portrayal was too soft for Lizzie.
To me, like Mr. Darcy’s pride makes him ‘Mr. Darcy’, Lizzie’s fire and sharp wit make her Lizzie…she’s no pushover! Go Lizzie 🙂
“But yes, that rain scene! “Spat” is a good word. She did look like a spitting kitten when she turned him down. And didn’t you think that they were going to kiss there? When he leaned in closer?”
Indeed 😊😮. Exquisitely sensual. I love the restraint. You could cut tension with a knife. Delicious. ❤️ That was my favourite scene in the movie.