The thread is open.
Episode 11: 31 May 2025
Episode 12: 7 June 2025
Episode 13: 14 June 2025
Episode 14: 21 June 2025
Episode 15: 28 June 2025
Episode 16: 5 July 2025
Episode 17: 12 July 2025
Episode 18: 19 July 2025
Enjoy the rewatch!
The thread is open.
Episode 11: 31 May 2025
Episode 12: 7 June 2025
Episode 13: 14 June 2025
Episode 14: 21 June 2025
Episode 15: 28 June 2025
Episode 16: 5 July 2025
Episode 17: 12 July 2025
Episode 18: 19 July 2025
Enjoy the rewatch!
Many thanks, @pkml3!! I’m glad to know that you’re back safe and sound.
I’ve just rewatched this episode for the umpteenth time, and realise that I like it very much. Again I’m seeing things in it that I failed to appreciate before. This is the episode with the trial that I can watch repeatedly as evidence of some of the best writing in the arguments used in a court trial.
I have quite a lot to say about this episode, but I’ll post it in bits.
Where the Writing is Extra Good: the Twists
The twisted-ness of Min is phenomenal. He is one of the smartest villains who uses the emotional attachments of pawns and their sense of justice against them. He deliberately chooses Cha to be on his side as his lawyer so that no matter what, Cha cannot do what his heart wants, ie to take HS’s side. If Cha loses the case, he is a bad lawyer who did not try his best, in order to be loyal to HS. When Cha wins the case, he loses HS.
Similarly, Min is able to put SH in a dilemma. He provokes SH to be violent against him while he pretends to be innocent of any provocation, and then sets up a situation where whether he is killed or not, SH and HS would suffer. If he died (and his life seems cheap to him!) at SH’s hands, HS would be miserable that SH had become a murderer in order to protect her. The guilt would eat her up. If Min killed SH, then HS would grieve and also feel burdened that SH had sacrificed himself to save her, plus she would be continually afraid for her own life.
In the current trial, Min had set it up so that he could still remain alive to hound HS later, while SH would likely be found guilty and be jailed as a murderer. If ever the amnesia trope was used well, it was in this show. SH’s amnesia was such a bonus for Min. Not only could SH not be sure that he is not the killer, but he had lost his ability to read minds.
From being a rather cocky character who rubbed his rivals the wrong way, he had become a helpless kid in need of support. His frenemy Chung Gi came to know him better by reading his cheesy diary entries to him, and HS who might have avoided him a lot more if he could still read her mind, was willing to take him in again.
I usually find it hard to watch underdog stories, but I love it when the underdog comes up fighting, risking it all for the truth. That’s what we get here with HS and Cha determined to fight for the innocent verdict of SH despite there being so much circumstantial evidence against him. I really liked that regardless of how others may have doubts about SH, and even when SH himself could not be sure that he was innocent, HS never wavered in her faith in him.
Re-watching this episode, I feel this is one of the best in terms of the script reaching its high point, really bringing on the feels and giving the first in a series of resolutions. The suspense followed by the natural emotional outburst at the verdict got me tearing up. I was in fact already feeling weepy from the time Do Yeon made her closing arguments and while anticipating what HS was going to say. I loved the crescendo of music and the way the camera pushed in to every face so that we can see what each felt at the announcement of the verdict.
On top of that, the scenes that follow are so on-point… we get the various concerns and emotions, the vindication of Lawyer Cha and the re-lighting of his hope. We see the predicament of SH who is like a child again without a guardian and who finds out that his guardian angel, HS is ‘claimed’ by Cha.
I was reading my script, around episode 20 and fixing few typos. Even if it comes from a complete rewriting, I could see it wasn’t as good quality as around episode 40. The fact is I made progress between the two times. In particular in some scenes about Point of View. And I said to myself I would need to edit again here or there about that (among other tips). Good screenwriting teachers say any scene has a point of view. Can be the one of a character, can be switching who during a scene. And so, I found this in Park Hye Ryun screenplay Ep11 here, about POW:
_________________________________________________________
#07. COURTHOUSE HALLWAY (N)
Kwan-Woo sits on the second-floor stairs, on the phone with Yoo-Chang.
KWAN-WOO: Yes, the jurors are deliberating now. Where are you, Yoo-Chang?
YOO-CHANG: (E) I’m in a car heading to Seoul.
KWAN-WOO: Nothing from Mun Sung-Nam, then?
YOO-CHANG: (E) No. I waited, but… she didn’t come out.
KWAN-WOO: (disappointed) Got it. See you tomorrow. (hangs)
Kwan-Woo sits, lost in thought, when Hye-Sung walks below. He stands to approach her, but Do-Yeon, following Hye-Sung, grabs her. Kwan-Woo pauses.
DO-YEON: Jang Hye-Sung.
HYE-SUNG: (turns) …Huh? What?
DO-YEON: (not accusing, genuinely frustrated) Let me ask. Don’t you feel sorry for your mother?
HYE-SUNG: No. Why?
DO-YEON: Your argument earlier, it’s the same logic Attorney Cha used in last year’s Min Joon-Kook case. You know that?
HYE-SUNG: (calmly) I know.
KWAN-WOO: !
DO-YEON: So you’re saying Attorney Cha was right back then? That logic freed the person who killed your mother?
HYE-SUNG: (removes Do-Yeon’s hand) Yeah. I think Cha… (struggling but firm) did his job as a lawyer.
KWAN-WOO: !!
DO-YEON: (not taunting, genuinely angry) I really pity your mother. If she knew you were doing this, how heartbroken she’d be in the afterlife…
HYE-SUNG: (tears welling, defiant) No. She’d say I’m right. That I’m doing well now…
KWAN-WOO: (moved) …
DO-YEON: I don’t think so…
HYE-SUNG: (cutting in, firm) She’s my mother! I know her best. She’d definitely say I did well! (walks off)
KWAN-WOO: (tears of gratitude) …
_________________________________________________________
#08. RESTROOM (N)
Hye-Sung washes her hands, trying to hold back tears, but they keep flowing.
HYE-SUNG: (gritting teeth, holding tears) Mom. I’m right, aren’t I? I did well, right?
Finally, Hye-Sung grips the sink and sobs, breaking down.
_________________________________________________________
#09. RESTROOM ENTRANCE (N)
Kwan-Woo hears Hye-Sung’s sobs from the restroom entrance.
Guilt and gratitude bring tears to his eyes too.
——————————————–
It’s not obvious because the scene is an argument Do-Yeon + Hye-Sung. But scene #9 gives confirmation to me. I understand this as Kwan-Woo point of view. He witness the scene, and it impacts him. We can see multiple shots on his face, as it’s a trick Korean screenplay can do much better than western screenplay. See the blank dialog lines, with just expressions from him. It’s also a trick I call “witness by proxy”. Kwan-Woo is the proxy for audience. He witness the scene (of course we see the scene too), but we react by proxy according the way he reacts to it.
Follow the scene with hearthbreaking sobs from Hye-Sung in the bathroom. But there too, we find out we are not alone to see (or hear) the scene. Last, Kwan-Woo is again our proxy. You can sometimes find this way to do in many scenes of kdramas. Audience could be sad when a character is crying, but I find there is even more emotion when another character witness the crying, and is also moved. It’s like it amplify everything because as witness too, audience go in the boots of the proxy.
That’s so true @WE. Kdramas do that now and then. From the angle of the camera, we know whose point of view we are joining, and we cry or laugh with them. Their emotions give us a greater impetus to feel the same way and more strongly than if we were ‘alone’.
Where the Script is Extra Good – The Irony
I loved all the irony that had been set up in advance in earlier episodes and which played out masterfully in that trial of SH:
– Cha who believed Min’s lies in the past and who was instrumental in getting Min off by arguing that there was doubt as to his guilt,… is the one now to believe that Min could have faked his death.
– Hye Sung who deplored the law that enabled Min to escape imprisonment after killing her mother, now embraces the same law to save SH. The writing of her argument, and her emotional beats were amazing. I liked the simple analogy of the 80% completed puzzle of the elephant and how on point it was.
– The conversation between HS and DY showed that there is still a stark difference in their way of thinking. HS has turned 180 degrees in deciding that Cha had made the right decision as a lawyer to get Min off the hook. Choosing the right way, even at personal cost, was what her Mum would have wanted. HS was right to think her mum would have been proud that HS had finally understood and had chosen to be a ‘real’ lawyer. Having Cha witness that conversation was a great short cut way for him to know that he might still have a chance with HS.
– [SPOILER]
Ex-judge Seo is complicit in his silence, because he knows that in Hwang Dal Joong’s case, Hwang’s wife had cut off her own hand and was alive. This would have strengthened the case for SH’s innocence. Hwang had from the beginning not wanted to jeopardise his own standing as a judge and had not revealed that his ruling against Hwang Dal Joong had been wrong. He had, unlike HS and Mum, chosen NOT to suffer personal cost for what was right and just. As a result, Hwang Dal Joong was stuck in jail for his life although he was innocent.
– Writer Park adds the twist that just as SH has come to realise that his gratitude towards HS includes admiration and a strong liking for her, he also finds out that Cha is hoping to start dating HS after winning SH’s case. So much irony because of course SH wants to be innocent, but he does not want to lose HS at the same time.
@GB, yeah the way the thematic can go from one argument to another in a 180°. This can be possible only because this thematic overlap several episodes, and it shows to me how so many elements are linked over the whole drama, from one episode to others, and a great planning/structure from writer.
Later, writer Park used thematic per episode (Start Up, Castaway Diva), but I find it more powerful when it’s more discret and engraved in the whole story like this drama or While you were sleeping. I find it more natural, and remove the weight of “one case, one episode”, even if it’s not only about a plot, but a story or theme too.
While Start-Up and Castaway Diva are brillant (the last one is a peak in writing like we rarely see), nethertheless, I find them less intense on dramatics. But of course with case of life or death, the drama is often more intense anyway.
@WE
I was hoping that by now we’d have news on Signal 2. However I see that the date in MDL says 2026.
If we are on a Park Hye Run watching spree, then the next show we can consider is While You were Sleeping. What do you think?
If it is not too much trouble would someone be able to send me or direct me to the link for the script for today’s episode?
@GB, I gladly rewatch anything Park Hye Ryun does. Pinnochio is also a good one.
About other dramas, we already had a Start-up rewatch. While you were sleeping is very popular and still today the favorite drama of many people. Episode 1 is perfect. And I never rewatched it fully (I only rewatched 5 first episodes). So it’s nice for me. +It still have high-concept in it. Even if it’s not used in a so intense way like SJJ does, I remember some cool ideas about the high-concept. So it’s in line with all the fantasy/Scifi stuff we often rewatch.
From what I remember from a previous watch, I wondered how it could be decided the victim was murdered when all they have is a dead hand. No body! I am willing to go with this because it makes a great story. Perhaps I have missed something because I have not rewatched the last few episodes?
@WE Okie dokie, When You Were Sleeping will likely be our NEXT REWATCH DRAMA!!!
https://mydramalist.com/21576-while-you-were-sleeping
So everyone, if you’ve other suggestions, please start listing them on this thread. In the meantime, we can also start rewatching WYWS. It was a good watch for me!
@MM, Hi.
What we have most to think it’s believable is the previous case with the same point of a hand as only clue and the man was condemned. I’ve no idea if there was a real case like that because I find that unrealistic too. I’ll ask GrokAI about that.
Hi @MM! We need to find the thread where @WE left the link for us to the script. You might try and go back about 4-5 episodes??? It’s a great read. I only read bits and pieces but the show really plays out as written… 98% I’d say.
As for Min being dead, it was mere speculation on the part of everyone except HS and possibly Cha. No proof could be found of course.
Hi @WE, @GB, @MM! Ready to start?
Let’s start NOW!!!
Oh yes, there was a precedent in that Hwang Dal Joong got convicted based on nothing but speculation and the hand of his wife (in the script it was a finger?) But anyway, Lawyer Shin feels bad til the present day that he never succeeded in getting him a shorter sentence.
Hi @SD!! You’re right on time!
Hi SD.
I’ve got a grokAI answer about the case, but I’ll post that after the rewatch.
Hello, I am back. So many comments before we start!
What I mean is how did they charge him with murder in the first place?
@WE, I always thought that without a body (US law?) death could not be presumed, and it would be enough for reasonable doubt. You might be able to make the assumption that the defendant committed assault given the circumstantial evidence, but not murder. But I am not a lawyer, so this is based on cop shows, LOL.
Hi @FF! We missed you! I got all excited over this episode and have more stuff to post a bit later. 🙂
Hi @FF
I think the judge accept the change of the defense because he feels guilty to have sentenced Min to be free in the previous trial.
Did DY just argue against reasonable doubt?
@WE, yes that’s possible. From the script I see that all the judges really wanted SH to be found innocent. They were afraid that the jury would decide that he was guilty. With a 5-4 vote, the judge was able to make the call ie give the final verdict without upsetting the jury.
Hi @SD, @WE & @GB, I miss you all too.
@MM, I didn’t hear that part about reasonable doubt from DY. I have to check the script later.
The assistant traps the vegetable seeller. But I think he should had a smartphone recording the dialogue.
Hi FF.
However we are just at 10 minutes. 😉
@WE The fruit/vege seller only hit him and chased Soo Chang away because he could not take away her reward money. However she does not do that to Do Yeon who could take back her money.
At 13 minutes we start the speech by HS that I love and mentioned above. The script here was so good.
Do-Hyeon take the previous trial about Min for making Soo-Ha accused this time. Ewkk!! it’s so bad from her.
And the music that accompanies HS’s speech… from softly… slowly it builds up. Getting more evident and clear as she speaks.
The next time the music accompanies the speech so well, rising with the mood… is when Judge Kong Sook gives the verdict.
Thank you for addressing my question. I can now put the trial into better perspective within the drama and not be caugh up in the RL legal technicalities, most of which I have learned form television anyway!
Hello @SD WE GB FF Is that everyone?
WYWS would be a good rewatch. I enjoyed it almost as much as this drama.
I don’t watch a lot of legal dramas, but I like them. All the speechs are that good in those kind of dramas ?
@WE, I will post a comment I had on Do Yeon later.
Here’s the scene that you posted the script on above.
@MM, if people agree, I would be delighted to rewatch WYWS. Plus, there is my little darling Kim So-Huyn in one of my favorite role from her, even if she’s just a support character.
@WE, Yes, many legal dramas have good speeches during the trials. The arguments have to sound effective and convince us.
I like how HS is confident that her mum will think that she and Kuan Woo are both doing the right thing according to the principles of the law even though she is feeling the pain from the law cutting both ways.
Hi @MM.
@FF, HS’s Mum had told her that HS made the right decisions and had faith in her. So I guess she imbibed that from her mum’s perspective.
@WE I agree. Very uncouth to use that arguement but I guess she is using it for legal reasons. My jaw dropped as DH was making that arguement.
@GB My impression of the puzzle arguement was that one can have pretty good idea from 80% what the truth is. I would say that 20% is where reasonable doubt occurs not extrapolation to the truth.
The bathroom scene would be usefull for many screenwriters about how it’s concise on script but effective (and a bit longer) on screen.
The director added a last shot on HS (not in the script), what is a simple and fast way to enhance the writing.
Now we have the main OST after the verdict is out. The judge feeling weak after reading out the verdict lol.
@GB, I think that speech is wonderful also. So much more effective given by the victim herself than by any other person. And also effective in showing HS’s growth in understanding.
@MM Yes the 20% of the puzzle would be the reasonable doubt. There was more than enough reasonable doubt, so again the law decided in favour of the defendant.
It does not seem right to me that DH’s arguement be accepted by the judges. It is emotionally manipulative.
@FF, the tension and stress level too high even for the judge LOL.
@SD, yes, that’s true. It shows how HS has grown as a person and a lawyer. At this stage she is still not wearing her lawyer badge.
Innocent!!
With one of the famous music of the drama. 🙂
Oh, here we are in the shoes of the judge, about to fall of emotion (while if we were anguish about the verdict, he knew it though, lol).
Now we come to the scene outside SH’s apartment where he shows how he feels about HS but it’s while she’s sleeping, so she does not know.
@GB Just watching HS’s closing arguement. Yes, very ironic that now she is arguing for reasonable doubt. The puzzle analogy is apt.
@MM IKR, that’s what I was mentioning in my comments above about irony. So good!!
yes the music was so on point.
She’s exhausted after this very hard working day and fall asleep in two seconds. So the amnesic boy give her a romantic scene. Even if he can’t remember her, we feel he still love her, at least for all she did for him, as if he deeply feel how much she care about him. WAAAaaaahhh; I’m melting.
@WE, we find out in SH’s dream, how he came to lose his memory and end up with that ‘uncle’ on the farm.
And now we find that the teeth-shaped post-it note pad has come to good use with HS giving a string of advice stuck to his fridge to SH as the adult mentoring the kid. She tells him not to contact her though, but he will follow all her advice except 2 post-it notes.
Haha Seong Bin, making use of SH’s memory loss to get close to him.
The episode is so dense, so much has happened and we’re only half way through. In preparation for the next twists ahead, we are shown that Hwang Dal Jung has a tumour in his brain and has not long to live.
@FF, fortunately it’s Chung Gi whom SH wants to hear from and he comes to tell SH that Sung Bin is lying.
We find the episode so dense already with half of it on the trial, then in a way similar to a couple of episodes ago, we get a sort of restart … this time Soo Ha is back and he is like a lost child again without a guardian, and he begins again to search for HS. It’s poignant that he buys a phone with the main intention of calling her, but finds to his chagrin that he cannot get her phone number from those who know it.
Kuan Woo is revitalized after winning SH’s case. He found his motivation again. The investigator gives a new lead to Kuan Woo.
What was the point of dh accusing HS of not caring for her mother? It serves to move the script along in the way the writer wanted it to go. But what is it saying about DH’s personality and reasoning abilities? Does it harken back to their earlier relationship?
@FF Later on … Cha Kwan Woo pushes his way into the prosecutor’s office to start a search for Min as criminal who had faked his death. This is based on what Soo Chang reported.
Sung-Bin, looool, pretending he’s mad in love with her. But it fails thanks to the boy who’s really loving her, Chung-Gi.
@GB, yes SH restarts and Kuan Woo too restarts.
Dense is right. I am only 20 minutes in!
I need some more caffeine!
@MM, I mentioned above that DY and her father never would stoop to paying the personal cost for the truth that could save an innocent person.
Do Yeon at first is like her father … brushing off the inconvenient truth to let matters lie even if the innocent was wrongly accused or the guilty allowed to be free. It was the way she’d ignored HS’s innocence over the fireworks accident, and the way she had wanted HS to get SH to plead guilty so that SH would get a shorter jail term. Her father, ex-judge Seo had done much worse. He had left the innocent Hwang rot in jail in order to save his own reputation. But at last DY is not as bad as her father and starts to investigate in case the guilty Min is still alive
@FF, I sort of pity Cha. He almost had a chance with HS but then SH crept into her heart and never left.
@WE, this is an aside. I meant to mention it last week, but got caught up in the drama. I want to recommend a film you may have seen already. It has one of the tightest, best scripts I have seen (though I am no expert). The film is A Separation, a 2011 film by Iranian director, Jodai-e Nadar-az Simin. I saw it for the first time a couple of weeks ago. It was at another’s house so I am not sure which streaming service. In the film we get a glimpse of the Iranian judicial system, which is interesting, but the most fascinating aspect is how by the end of the film, we as the viewer get a sense of each of the character’s motivations and view point and sympathize with each. It is one of those films which lives in your head for weeks after.
Violent Korean public, physically attacking the public defender. Is it added to mock the judicial system?
@SD, I took a screenshot. I’ll ask to a Iranian screenwriter I know about the movie. As I can’t note it now, I did a screenshot first. 😉
@MM, I’m just at 40 now, I had to put on pause several times to read comments. 😉
@FF, I have the impression that the Korean public are a lot more ‘violent’ and loud than we are over here.
LOL HS gets saved but she won’t thank the judge. I wonder why she always had this thing about disrespecting this judge.
I’m for an attorney Cha + Do-Yeon couple.
But it will never happen. T T
@WE LOL, Do Yeon does not seem like the kind to date anyone, let alone a nice guy like Cha.
DY’s curiosity is piqued by Kuan Woo’s deliberate attempt. Now she visits the informer, but shouldn’t she speak to the informer before proceeding with prosecuting?
We find out now that Min really is alive!!! We get to see him in beard and glasses. Timestamp 53:20
Script direction is quite precise, but anyway, I find it so amazing how the main actress portray the character.
@WE, @SD … We get to see the nifty revolving door again – the image of gears spinning in HS’s mind – but this time SH enters the door and stops the gears for a while, a sign of how he’s really taken up residence in HS’s mind, even when she keeps herself away from him.
I just got
A laugh thinking about aging.
My brain is like my knee. I can use it for short periods of time but I cannot do any marathons!
I’d need to post the script but here the scene in the corridor (near toilet door).
HS rejects Cha.
He ask if it’s because she didn’t forgive him.
Nope, it’s not for that.
He asks “then why”.. CUT !!!!!
Could seems like a hook, but…
Asap next scene with Soo-Ha running in the street.
Here the answer. 😉
I think
@FF, I always feel that the investigation is not very thorough. Each team, either defence or prosecuting, just has a fixed idea of what they want to get/use as evidence and don’t go further. It was Cha who showed what a good defence lawyer could do beyond the normal standard tasks.
LOL @MM where did the thought on knees and marathons come in?
@GB Both her mother and herself lost all respect for judge SEO?
But it’s silly, just later, she tries to avoid him. She’s has hard time to accept any feeling with this younger-embarassing boy. Damn, the heroine has big trouble to see in herself, but anyway, it’s like that since the drama starts. 🙂
@GB, yes dramas always portray the legal system and its enforcers and administrators as sloppy.
@WE, yes SH is the answer to why HS says no to Cha. The cut to SH tells us. Later we hear it.
This second half of the episode we get to see HS admit that she likes Soo Ha. She wants to get him out of her system ,.. possibly because he’s so much younger than herself. But she’s torn between being the adult that he can depend on and the woman that he likes, who likes him back.
@MM yes, no respect for Seo. But even nicer judge Kong Sook, she does not seem to respect.
@GB, Kuan Woo finally gets his answer why he is not the one.
@WE
No matter how HS lies to get away from SH, her actions belie her words. She will always be concerned about him. She will still goes out in the rain to check if he’s where she had left him, sitting in the rain, and true enough, he is. This move says a lot more than words ever do. For one thing it shows that she and Cha did not have a date, and that even if they did, SH was more important to her. He looks at her hopefully and later has a relieved, happy smile.
My knee took me on a very pleasant long walk 2 days ago and I have been hobbling around the house ever since.
I get very exhausted with these rewatches–too intense for my aging brain cells.In both cases walking and rewatching are good for me!!!
@WE,
It is still easier for HS to be the caring adult with regards to SH, choosing what her heart wants to do, because SH is still a helpless ‘kid’ to her at this stage. But in his eyes, she had become much more than a caring adult.
The other well used trope, the umbrella held by the one who would be the hero over the heroine trope, works so well in this show. It is appropriate that HS is the one to bring the umbrella, the adult who will provide the shelter for the kid. But seeing him, she becomes no better than a kid herself.
She lets go of the umbrella and squats in the rain with him, bringing herself to meet him at his level, wondering what to do with him and herself. Then it’s SH who takes up the umbrella to shelter them both, but mainly to shelter her. He takes on the role of the adult and the man. No matter what, even with only fragments of memories, and based on the promises he’d made in his diary, he would still be her protector. What a powerful comment on their relationship. And this is where the episode ends.
@MM, yes, keeping the brain and muscles limbered up are the only way to keep the cells from dying faster than they should. It’s hard work but practice and exercise is important to slow down what age does.
As others said earlier we see HS developing more respect fo the law in the scene between her and DH that DW overhears.
I am still at 19 minutes!
Crying in he bathroom scene with DW rying outside the bathroom-the personal loss for the truth that @GB mentioned above. Yes WE I need to reread your comment later.
@GB, good insight about the role of SH and HS. It is why SH seems older than he is, because he is the one cleaning up after her and fixing her lights and cupboard latches and the door (earlier) and even now wants to protect her. Probably part of why she falls for him. She has lost her mother, she is alone in the world, and in him she has someone who helps her, some what in the way her mother did (reminding her what is the right thing to do, for example). Although he does not yell at her the way her mother did.
Nice to read your comments about this episode (earlier in the thread) and here. So much subtleness in this episode, small actions which reflect the larger story.
She really could find more harsh words for him in the coffee shop. Damn dramas, they are loud on harshness!!
She really “couldn’t”… I wrote too fast, argh.
@SD, I’m glad you were able to read my thoughts on this episode. I got all excited and started writing after I did a rewatch.
If you managed to read that we’re thinking of watching “While You Were Sleeping” next, you can let us know if you’re okay with that and start watching it.
The judge almost faits after the verdict!
The reversal comes with the “toilet” scenes which was cut off. And we have last word from HS.
So, no matters what she said after, as a way to escape to her feeling, it ends with her and Soo-Ha under the rain, with, as GB noticed, the change about who hold the Umbrella.
Best way to make an emotion strong is (as we noticed in Castaway Diva) to make it impossible first. 🙂
@GB, “While You Were Sleeping” is another drama I have not yet watched but which is on my long list. I would love to do a “rewatch” on it. So is Pinocchio for that matter. I like the idea of starting a Park Hye Run rewatch series. @We’s comments made me want to watch Castaway Diva all the way to the end. I kind of lost interest when she was about to make it big.
The reappearance of the tooth post it notes from episode 1 is a jokey reference to how well this show uses more complicated motifs!
I am way behind per usual, at the spot where Do Yeon notices the advertisement for the fruit lady and sighs an annoyed sigh. I read the earlier comments about DY. I think that although she is heavily influenced by her father, probably as a child without consciously realizing it, DY is also influenced by HS. In particular, her failure at the courthouse with HS when HS went in and she did not. It bothers her. Other things start to bother her. She knows, here, that being a good prosecutor requires she knows everything about the case, and that she really needs to follow up on this bit of information. It irks DY, but she is good enough to know she needs to do this.
HS is starting to understand her role in achieving justice. In this episode she made the huge break through of understanding the necessity of that thin rope, reasonable doubt. This scene with the advertisement is one of many in this episode where DY starts to understand her own role in justice better.
@MM, huh?! The tooth post was from episode 1. Crazy, after Xth rewatch I missed it!
@SD, probably you should watch WYWS, just that. I think you will fall from your chair at the end of episode 1. 😀 (and probably halfway before too)
I may be here on my own now.
How the drama comes full circle back to the case 26 years ago and starts a new arc about DH/DY what was previously hinted at.
GrokAI about the case with missing hand: AI couldn’t find a real korean case with that, but keep in mind that GrokAI isn’t perfect and MAYBE there could be a real case everyone forgot but the writer used.
Anyway, about how realistic is the case, here the answer from GrokAI:
South Korean Legal Framework (Summary)
In South Korea, a murder conviction without a complete body is legally plausible if evidence establishes death and guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. A severed hand, identified via DNA, fingerprints, or other markers, can suffice as proof of death, especially when supported by additional evidence like blood, DNA, circumstantial factors (e.g., motive, suspect behavior), or witness testimony. Since the 2000s, South Korean courts have increasingly relied on forensic evidence, such as DNA analysis, for convictions. In the 1980s-1990s, however, investigations often depended on confessions or limited evidence, sometimes leading to judicial errors. In the context of “I Hear Your Voice”, a conviction based on a severed hand, blood, and DNA is realistic, though the drama may have simplified procedural complexities for dramatic effect.
We know when she is hiding from DW that he will be around the corner but we do not expect her to fall backwards in surprise. So I anticipated a rather routine ploy in kdramas but an interesting twist was added. The little scenes that please!
The kind judge asks how she became a lawyer with her attitude. More irony!
Your skirt is backwards says the kind judge. Entirely unexpected and very funny!
@WE Thank you for the info about SK law. Melts away some of my uncertainties about the plot, which I found rather unlikely from this writer, and highlights just how clever ad meaningful the plot is.
Hey they actully got wet in the rain! No magic rain barrier. He looks so pitiful!
@MM, it’s nothing, but I find it right to mention that anyway, in a drama: dramatic and emotions are first, then plot follow. I think writer Kim Soon Ok made it not only parody but a meta-effect in her drama “Escape of the Seven”, ignoring any realism and focusing in a heavy way about dramatics as if it were the only law of the drama (and exposing it in a meta-way on purpose). But I have to confess that this “tour de force” was too much for me and I would prefered more consistency, in particular at the very end (that I found quite bad). However many times in the drama I found it great. Really one of my favorite writer. Just I find the Penthouse better in every way, except maybe the 5 first episodes of Escape of the Seven.
@WE the script from the courthouse scene between HS and DY is very interesting to read . The script addresses the question I had about DY’s motivation. Illustrates the challenge to the actress in that scene. The script says her initial comment is non accusatory. I saw it as accusatory. The writer knew how it might come across.
@MM, we tend to forget it, especially at this point in the drama, but DY would have known HS’s mother very well also. She would have grown up with her in the house and could have thought of her as a second mother. But we know, having seen it in the scene where SH is helping her mother with the party for DY and complains bitterly (just before the firecracker scene) that SH’s mother very much modifies her behavior around DY and her family.
@MM, I’m glad you noticed that. You see more how precise (but yet concise) are drama scripts, and it’s a challenge for any screenwriter to do that. Put the essential on the page, then the production team (actors, director, editor) take the best of it.
@GB To extend the discussion of the scene in the rain, I thought at first that she went to him because of the open window in her apartment and thoughts about the security she had when he lived there. It would also be because she was thnking about him in the rain, unprotected. And then the scene in the rain where they are protecting each other!
I have been trying to come upwith the term for a scene in a drama,like this scene, that illustrates so much about a theme, encapsulating so much about the narrative.
Any ideas? It was a scene in Story of Kunning Palace that had me searching for this term.
@SD I had not thought about the relationship between Dy and HS’s mother. That adds another dimension to how DY Might be feeling about the mother’s death and the trial that freed the killer.